On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Mark Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would definitely support the incusion of a JSON library in the > > standard lib. And, I think that it should be simplejson which is > > used by TurboGears, Pylons, and bundled with Django. > > I'd tentatively agree, though I recall seeing a post not long ago > (which I am currently unable to find) from the author of jsonlib > lamenting the fact that most of the other JSON modules for Python had > various significant inconsistencies with the RFC. While authors of > competing tools should be taken with a grain of salt, I do think > compliance with the spec is an important factor for any particular > module that might be blessed with stdlib membership, and so should > play a bigger role in any such decision than mere benchmark speed.
Well, so fix this. How hard can it be? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com