+1
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:web-sig- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Bicking > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 10:06 AM > To: Graham Dumpleton > Cc: Web SIG > Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] Revising environ['wsgi.input'].readline in the > WSGI specification > > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > 2008/11/16 Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> We need to make a revision to the WSGI spec to say that > >> environ['wsgi.input'].readline takes an optional size argument. It > always > >> does in practice (except in wsgiref.validate.validator, rendering > that > >> validator useless), and is required to in practice, because everyone > uses > >> cgi.FieldStorage, and it passes in that argument. > > > > This has been brought up numerous times before. There are other > things > > about wsgi.input that really need to be changed as well to make it > > more useful. When I have pushed for revised specification before I > > could never get enough interest in it from the people that most would > > perceive are the ones who oversee the PEP. > > Yes, this has been passed over before. To resolve this, let's just not > pass it over this time? This is a relatively small change to the WSGI > spec, because it represents standard practice -- this change is simply > getting the spec in line with implementations. > > -- > Ian Bicking : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://blog.ianbicking.org > _______________________________________________ > Web-SIG mailing list > Web-SIG@python.org > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web- > sig/fumanchu%40aminus.org _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
