On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:07 PM, P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > At 05:00 PM 9/19/2009 +0100, René Dudfield wrote: >> >> Issues with proposal? Things this proposal did not consider? > > I'm wary of anything that makes correct middleware harder to write. How > should an application that does path traversal work? > > More precisely, take a look at the wsgiref.util.shift_path_info() function; > how would it work under your proposal? >
hi, Not sure. Will look into it. Another thing I just realised should be in there... there should be an optional way to specify a buffer for the various functions to write into. Otherwise you are forced to allocate memory after all. Will send an update addressing those two things... cu, _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
