On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Graham Dumpleton
<graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snipitty snip snip cut cut trim trim strip]
> Anyway, I am at the point that if someone else wants to do that, ie.,
> document the proposals and provide example implementation code that
> will run on top of WSGI 1.0, they can, but frankly I am not sure I can
> be bothered now even though I suggested it.
>
Yeah, I think we need to show implementations of things at this point.
Also to take a little time for reflection, and research. There's been
200 emails, and lots to consider. It's also only been about a week.
It'd probably take at least another week for someone to collect the
various arguments together and summarise them.
There does seem to be a lot of agreement about things though, and we
have definitely worked out a lot of stuff in the week. At least more
of us understand more of the issues now - and other peoples concerns.
Starting a summary page (feel free to edit) of our discussion:
http://www.wsgi.org/wsgi/WSGI_sep_2009
cu,
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
