--- On Wed, 11/25/09, Chris Dent <chris.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Chris Dent <chris.d...@gmail.com> > I can (barely) relate to some of the complaints that > start_response is a pain in the ass, but environ, to me, is > not broken. I agree. It maps nicely onto the underlying protocol and WSGI is supposed to be low level right? The biggest problem with start_response is that after you evaluate iterable = application(env, start_response) Sometimes the start_response has been called and sometimes it hasn't, and this can break middlewares when they haven't been tested both ways (repose.who for example seems to assume it has been called). By the way, I created a little interface for archiving notes about wsgi2 here http://listtree.appspot.com/wsgi2 To add to it you need to fill in a captcha and use the password "wsgi". I thought I announced this to web-sig yesterday, but apparently I messed up my reply-to. If you like, please add something there. I'd be delighted if you did. I think it might be an interface that is easier to "scan" than a million emails. -- Aaron Watters _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com