Hi,

Is there a status update on that now I missed? Did something decide on bytes for the environment values or are we still unsure about that?

From a discussion lately I had with Graham on #pocoo it seems like he lost interest on supporting WSGI on Python 3 for the time being due to lack of interest.

My personal pet project of actively redesigning WSGI to see if a higher-level protocol would solve the unicode issue better failed and was not worth the effort.

As I understand Python 3.0/1/2 will be broken for WSGI anyways so we can stop caring about the stdlib.

CherryPy seems to be the only system currently with an actively maintained Python 3 version of WSGI which from my understanding is based on unicode and bytes, where unicode is seen as latin1.

At that point I don't care at all about what is decided on as long as something is decided. Can someone please stand up and just do that? :)


Regards,
Armin
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to