> I generally like it.
>
> About the *.file_wrapper removal, i suggest
> a PSGI-like approach where 'body' can contains a File Object.
>
> def file_app(environ):
> fd = open('/tmp/pippo.txt', 'r')
> status = b'200 OK'
> headers = [(b'Content-type', b'text/plain')]
> body = fd
> return body, status, headers
>
As far as I understand it, `body` is an iterable so there should not be any
problem with sending a file through directly in this manner. Better, the web3
spec specifically mandates that if the `body` iterable has a `close` method it
must be called on request completion (second-to-last paragraph in the
specification details section [0]). So a File Object as a body is already
completely handled by web3.
On the other hand, `body` has to yield bytes, so `fd = open('/tmp/pippo.txt',
'rb')` I think.
> def file_app(environ):
> fd = open('/tmp/pippo.txt', 'r')
> status = b'200 OK'
> headers = [(b'Content-type', b'text/plain')]
> body = [b'Header', fd, b'Footer']
> return body, status, headers
>
>
> (and what about returning multiple File objects ?)
>
Well you could just use `itertools.chain([b'Header'], fd, [b'Footer'])` and
`itertools.chain(*files)` respectively though there is the issue that, with
non-refcounting GCs (Jython, IronPython, pypy), these may stay unclosed for
quite some time. A good idea would probably be some kind of `closingchain`
replacement to `itertools.chain` which would be able to `close()` its
sub-iterables if they're closable (or maybe a `contextchain` which calls
`__enter__` and `__exit__` on its sub-iterables if those are available).
[0] http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/#specification-details
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
