On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:09 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote: > If a WSGI-1-compatible protocol seems more sensible to folks, I'm > personally happy to defer discussion on PEP 444 or any other > backwards-incompatible proposal.
I think both make sense. PEP 444 can continue to be worked out (and it should be!); the changes here are pretty much uncontroversial. It also helps clarify how WSGI should work on IronPython, which has the same str/unicode issues as Python 3 - that fact it's basically how I've implemented it for IronPython is nice as well. - Jeff _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
