On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:
Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me
repeat my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24
hours, can PEP 3333 be accepted?
+9001 (> 9000)
It seems a lot of people are waiting for a decision that enables
implementers to go ahead and claim PEP
333[3] compatibility.
Django, mod_wsgi, CherryPy, etc. all have solutions that would need
AFIK minor tweaking before going "live", which would make adoption of
PEP 3333 the fastest of any PEP I've ever seen. ;)
PEP 444 can take longer.
Indeed it will! :D
I have the conversion from Textile to ReST about half completed; I'll
continue to poke it now that mailing list traffic seems to have died
down and won't be consuming the majority of my Copious Spare Time™.
ReST just doesn't jive with my neural net. :/
- Alice.
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
