On 2012-03-29, at 12:38 , Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On 29 March 2012 21:02, Masklinn <maskl...@masklinn.net> wrote: >> Moving here as suggested by Terry Reedy as this list may be more >> interested than -ideas (note: some feedback already used to revise >> the original proposal, and a very basic patch — with no tests — is >> provided for the current CPython default branch) >> >> Currently, calling wsgiref.simple_server simply mounts the (bundled) >> demo app. >> >> I think that's a bit of a lost opportunity: the community seems to have >> mostly standardized on a wsgi script providing an application callable >> in its global namespace (though details may differ, mod_wsgi does not >> care for the script's name and mandates an `application` callable while > > Apache/mod_wsgi only defaults to 'application', it is configurable.
OK, I didn't see any note on the subject so I didn't think that was the case. Sorry. That's what my (revised) proposal supports anyway, defaulting to 'application' but overridable. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
