On 11 October 2014 08:10, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Graham Dumpleton
> <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So PJE, please step back and do not go rushing out to create a PEP. That is
>> the worst thing you could do at this point and will only serve to deter
>> people from the community contributing and so stifle proper discussion about
>> this whole topic.
>
> Huh?  Have you *read* the PEP?  The entire point of it is to provide a
> basis for *experimenting* with new standards, not to "stifle
> discussion" of them.  It's not even an *API*, for heavens' sake.  It's
> just a description of how to upgrade to new standards from within
> existing WSGI frameworks, without needing to tunnel responses and
> without breaking subrequest middleware.

FWIW I'm totally fine with you bringing together that PEP - as you say
its complementary to what I'm focused on (I believe I even suggested
you might want to do that).

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to