On 11 October 2014 08:10, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Graham Dumpleton > <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So PJE, please step back and do not go rushing out to create a PEP. That is >> the worst thing you could do at this point and will only serve to deter >> people from the community contributing and so stifle proper discussion about >> this whole topic. > > Huh? Have you *read* the PEP? The entire point of it is to provide a > basis for *experimenting* with new standards, not to "stifle > discussion" of them. It's not even an *API*, for heavens' sake. It's > just a description of how to upgrade to new standards from within > existing WSGI frameworks, without needing to tunnel responses and > without breaking subrequest middleware.
FWIW I'm totally fine with you bringing together that PEP - as you say its complementary to what I'm focused on (I believe I even suggested you might want to do that). -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com