yes .. but Too Simple?? May be KISS is good..
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:24 PM, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for web2py-vm > > On Oct 29, 12:37 pm, Joe Barnhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about web2py w/batteries included? (old python joke) > > > > I think it should retain its "branding" with web2py, so people don't > > get confused and think it's not related. Some (probably stupid) > > ideas: > > > > web2py++ > > web2py/os > > web2py-vm > > > > etc. > > > > On Oct 29, 9:53 am, "Phyo Arkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Web2Os sounds ok but .. hmm .. Anyone ? anyidea?? > > > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > web2os? > > > > > > You can tell I am not good with names! > > > > > > On Oct 29, 9:51 am, "Phyo Arkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > web2py OS development started. Stay tuned! > > > > > > > What will this be named? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
