It looks like ceej maintains this mirror - I've sent him an email about this so he can take care of it.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > The person maintaining the github repository should just do this; > It doesn't look like github has an issue tracker (shame), so you can't > really report this to the mirror maintainer... > > I've edited that wiki, and put a warning in it (I'm sure someone will be > unhappy, but oh, well!) > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Of course, if it were I - I would not put empty placeholder files in my >> master if I did not need to, nor useless init files .... >> We who mirror where that is needed can write our own scripts to hold those >> directories (by putting empty files in; I wouldn't do the other way around, >> as the whole point of web2py is no setup - and changed code is... well, >> changed code). >> >> Your mileage may vary..... >> >> Y. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> bazaar and svn version directories and files;cvs and mercurial and git >>> do not; >>> >>> To "hold" directories (since they are not really versioned) you need to >>> put an empty file in them. >>> >>> You can see how I handled it for mercurial by looking at the repository >>> at http://bitbucket.org/yarko/web2py/ >>> >>> (you don't have to use mercurial - you can just get a zip or tar file - >>> see upper-right). >>> >>> Massimo - perhaps you could (just as a service to the community that uses >>> other repositories) include / merge in "empty, directory place-holder" files >>> for those that use other repositories? It's not strictly necessary, but >>> then the mirrors would at least look the same, and be comparable with tools. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yarko >>> >>> I've been a little busy, so I haven't updated in the past week, but >>> likely will this weekend.... >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, BigBaaadBob <w...@rwwa.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Massimo: >>>> >>>> I'm curious on your thoughts here. I'd like to use git and track your >>>> Google repo because I think that is the authoritative one. There are >>>> options: >>>> >>>> * If you make the currently empty directories non-empty (by adding >>>> a .something file or something) this will "just work". >>>> >>>> * I can cause the empty directories to be created somehow and publish >>>> that for other git users (tracking svn) could do the same. This could >>>> even be automated somehow. >>>> >>>> I understand that you might not want to do things to support a SCM you >>>> don't use. >>>> >>>> On Jan 16, 9:50 am, BigBaaadBob <w...@rwwa.com> wrote: >>>> > Ceej: I'm using git-svn to track Massimo's SVN repo directly. >>>> > >>>> > It is probably just me, but I prefer to track the authoritative >>>> > repo. I worry if different repos have the different "trunk" >>>> > content. I know you are only talking about .gitignore files but it >>>> > feels like a slippery slope to me. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
