Familiar discussion to me because I raised same topic before. :-) Glad to see LEGEND is in, it is not too late for me to quit the habbit of TAG.LEGEND. :-P
Seriously speaking, I still suggest to make TAG.xxxx more noticeable (e.g. the first one in HTML helper section) in the builtin document as well as the pdf manual. On Jan 25, 9:05 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > in trunk, thanks. No more helpers please. One has to stop > somewhere. ;-) > > Massimo > > On Jan 24, 3:22 pm, Markus Gritsch <m.grit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:43 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > You know you can use TAG.LEGEND instead, right? > > > No, I must have overlooked the 'Custom Helpers' section in the Book, > > sorry. Thank you for the hint. So this makes my patch obsolete. On > > the other hand, why are there explicit classes for helpers like HEAD, > > TITLE, B, EM and so on? Couldn't they all have been written using > > TAG.xxx? And especially since FIELDSET is there, I thought LEGEND has > > the same qualification to be implemented as a normal helper... > > > Kind regards, > > Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
