Do no not not recommend it any more. There was a time when I though that one should use Apache mod_rewrite and such feature did not belong in web2py. Now that it is there and I see how people use it, I agree there is value in it. We should all thank user voltron for insisting that we add that it.
Massimo On Apr 20, 1:16 pm, Álvaro Justen [Turicas] <alvarojus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > I know it is ugly but 1) it works; 2) it very powerful when compared > > with routes on rails and urls in Django; 3) is is backward compatible. > > > Does not anybody remember that I never wanted to add this to web2py? > > Now you know why. > > Why you do not recommend using routes.py, like > in:http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/42 > ? > > I think this is very useful, including for create nice and more > readable URLs (I don't like a "/default/" or some long URLs created by > default). > Does routes.py decreases web2py performance in an way that its use is > discouraged? > > -- > Álvaro Justen > Peta5 - Telecomunicações e Software Livre > 21 3021-6001 / 9898-0141 > http://www.peta5.com.br/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
