I think this can be implemented. Will try later today. On Monday, 31 December 2012 11:30:34 UTC-6, DenesL wrote: > > +1 for an extended syntax instead of routes. > > Blog post about http://blog.2partsmagic.com/restful-uri-design/ which > discusses some schemes (about halfway down, with the title "Choosing a URI > schemes for resource hierarchies" (sic)). > > One thing to think about is how to define the creation of new resources > via templates, > e.g. /person/new > where "new" would be a reserved word; the template would be POSTed when > filled. > > About the /dogs issue: > it may be solved by having the query parameter at the pattern level > instead of at the parse_as_rest level: > patterns = [ ('/dogs[pet]', query=db.pet.kind=='dog') ] > pros/cons? > > > Denes > > On Sunday, December 30, 2012 1:04:13 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> It could be possible via routes but it would be nice it the syntax were >> to allow it. I stopped developing it because I though instead of >> reinventing the wheel with this syntax we may want to support some >> standard. Is there any? >>> >>> >>>>
--
