I know that I will eventually have that problem. thats why I got the plan to migrate to postgres when I got more time. the problem with postgres migration is that I used a couple field names which you are not allowed to use in postgres so I can't simply move the db with me thats quite a bit of work. So I try to keep it running with SQLite until I got more time.
On Saturday, April 6, 2013 4:51:03 PM UTC+2, Niphlod wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 6, 2013 3:29:24 PM UTC+2, Vasile Ermicioi wrote: >> >> Don't really know where you saw the 100k user statement.... >> >> http://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html >> > > Make a simple app (even with "less bloated" frameworks) that writes to a > db every time a user hits a page. I bet I can lock the db in no time. > The problem is not "how many users are hitting the website" but "how many > users are hitting the website and trying to write to the db". > As far as read is concerned, I never had a "database locked" problem with > SQLite, WAL active or not. > >> >> editing a single table from multiple users ... no. >> >> with WAL enabled the response is YES! >> >> > Nope. It helps for sure, but doesn't prevent locking in an "universal" way. > > Test it yourself, open one shell ... > sqlite3 storage.db > SQLite version 3.7.13 2012-06-11 02:05:22 > Enter ".help" for instructions > Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";" > sqlite> create table m(col_a integer); > sqlite> insert into m values(1); > sqlite> PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL; > wal > sqlite> insert into m values(1); > sqlite> select * from m > ...> ; > 1 > 1 > 3 > ok, now open another shell > > sqlite3 storage.db > SQLite version 3.7.13 2012-06-11 02:05:22 > Enter ".help" for instructions > Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";" > sqlite> insert into m values(3); > sqlite> BEGIN TRANSACTION; > sqlite> insert into m values(3); > sqlite> select * from m; > 1 > 1 > 3 > 3 > sqlite> > > now, back to the previous one > sqlite> insert into m values(1); > Error: database is locked > > > voilĂ , WAL active, but locked database anyway. > > tl;dr : You can't have an open transaction that made writes to the db and > contemporarily read the database. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.