Hi Massimo, have you had a chance to look at this? I am just wondering if I 
need to create a workaround outside of the framework or if this will be 
incorporated. No worries either way.

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:23:39 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Please open a ticket with your patch so I do not forget. I will look at it 
> carefully tomorrow. I welcome more discussion on the topic.
>
> On Sunday, 25 August 2013 21:15:04 UTC-5, mr.freeze wrote:
>>
>> Precisely why I am pushing for a generic onrender method. Adding an 
>> attributes property to either the field or the widget only couples it to 
>> the presentation layer further.  Also, attributes are only one aspect of 
>> the usage. Others would be value based modification, wrapping the element 
>> or appending child elements.  What about db.table.widget.onrender = ....? 
>> The crux is that default widgets aren't applied until a form is rendered. 
>> This might need to be changed.
>>
>> On Sunday, August 25, 2013 8:59:31 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>>
>>> I like this better than the original proposal but I am still unhappy. I 
>>> think Field(...widget=...) is already too much coupling between the 
>>> database layer and the presentation (form) layer. I do not think this 
>>> coupling should be increased. Can we do something like:
>>>
>>> db.table.field.widget.attributes = ... 
>>>
>>> On Sunday, 25 August 2013 17:05:37 UTC-5, Alan Etkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ok, the thing is that there are no hooks in rendering cause all the 
>>>>>>>>>>> rendering is meant to be happen in your own widget." - I disagree.  
>>>>>>>>>>> You can 
>>>>>>>>>>> modify a SQLFORM after it renders. I am simply trying to achieve a 
>>>>>>>>>>> similar 
>>>>>>>>>>> effect at the Field level.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about a Field(..., attributes={"class": "required"}) argument so 
>>>> widgets can override their attributes with those on creation. This would 
>>>> avoid the need of adding custom widget code for that simple task. OTOH I 
>>>> think the best would be not to provide the shortcut because it sort of 
>>>> mixes the database configuration and the client user interface. I'd 
>>>> instead 
>>>> subclass the widgets so they add the class to the html if the field is 
>>>> required.
>>>>
>>>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to