*To Alan E.*

 

*Q»* Will it break *backward compatibility*, then?

That will be bad.

 

Please implement the new feature in such a way that Emails can be retrieved 
easily by *Message.Content[i]* for plaintext and html. And *
Message.Attachments[ii]* and 
*Message.Attachments[ii].type* for attachments and attachment types. Make 
it Easy, Simple, and Intuitive.

 
 

 

 


On Sunday, October 13, 2013 12:42:48 PM UTC-4, Alan Etkin wrote:
>
>
>>    - Does this mean that *message.content* will not work in the future? 
>>
>>  This is because the current adapter uses an invalid field type for 
> attachment and content fields that can raise errors when used with other 
> core features. In order to keep those fields, they should have custom field 
> types (experimental), since none of the built-in types is suitable for them.
>
>>
>>    - Also, does it mean than the users will have to write their own 
>>    message content extraction by traversing the MIME Multipart?
>>
>> Yes, unless the above issue is solved.
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to