> > I would still prefer to use web2py to retreive it.
by using it's _tableobj I meant.. and then use GAE api On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:34:05 PM UTC+1, Quint wrote: > > As long as it's not we will need to use GAE api directly then.. > > To put() the entity that is. > I would still prefer to use web2py to retreive it. > > On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:14:14 PM UTC+1, Quint wrote: >> >> Also, is the use of named keys supported by DAL? I think it is not >> >> >> As long as it's not we will need to use GAE api directly then.. >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:53:05 PM UTC+1, Alan Etkin wrote: >>> >>> > (For instance when I want to supply a "key_name" when I put() an >>> entity so I can have better performance to get() that entity from db. >>> > Or when I want to use put_multi()) >>> >>> put_multi is supported by DAL trough the bulk_insert method. How better >>> is performance when using named keys? Do you have benchmarks?. Also, is the >>> use of named keys supported by DAL? I think it is not: >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/lFKiIGary0c/_sx0EoJkYk0J >>> >>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
