Well I suggested this before. Facilitate the BETWEEN SQL operator in the DAL. Maybe something like drange(low value, high value). When you mention the DAL extensible, your thoughts on how? I have seen it attempted by either user defined functions of a blob-like type or as a real custom defined type. I would love to be able to do vectors as a simple field entry of a compound object.
On May 29, 7:56 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > I am rewriting the DAL so any suggestion in this direction is welcome. > I think we do not need a geoweb2py fork, I think we should be able to > make the DAL extensible so that it can be subclassed. > > On May 29, 5:01 am, haftish21 <haftis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Right - you need to pay USD 10 for it:http://www.lulu.com/content/4968879 > > > >>'ll get as soon as possible, full version is what I need. > > > It's not a fully-qualified domain, won't ever work outside your > > campus... > > > >>Then let me get another help from u to broaden it, take it out of my > > >>campus. How could I fully qualify its domain? > > > If spatial database consistency is new 2 web2py, then it calls a lot > > of assignments 4 me to fill the gap. > > > Let us talk how to realize "geoweb2py", I'm really getting the > > interest 2 write a proposal on this demand and show it 2 my professor. > > What do u think? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
