Yes, I did read up on it, and I am familiar with jwt. I do think it's more insecure than this.
On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:16:43 PM UTC-7, Niphlod wrote: > > do you know what a jwt token is instead of just blindly bashing a solution? > > > On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 12:25:54 AM UTC+2, Derek wrote: >> >> The only difference between this and jwt (saying jwt tokens is like >> saying atm machine, it's redundant) is that jwt can be generated client >> side (provided the client knows the secret) and thus would be less secure >> than this. >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 1:16:31 PM UTC-7, Niphlod wrote: >>> >>> summarizing, IMHO web2py should probably implement JWT tokens >>> <http://jwt.io/> instead of this custom one to have it called properly >>> "API tokens" >>> >> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
