Yep. Am using the same data over and over and over.... On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:51:53 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote: > > Assuming there is some reason you can't move the additional query > conditions to the database and you must do the filtering in Python (e.g., > the query is complex or you need to filter the same set of rows in multiple > ways), you can use the .find() method > <http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/06/the-database-abstraction-layer#find--exclude--sort> > > of the Rows object: > > primary_residence_rows = all_rows.find(lambda r: r.primary_residence == > True) > > Anthony > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 8:53:49 AM UTC-5, Mark Billion wrote: >> >> This seems ugly: >> foo = db(db.xxx.id==x.id).select() >> for a in foo: >> if a.primary_residence == True: >> nine_b_count = 1 >> ...... >> Is there a way for me to select only the elements of foo that meet the >> secondary test. Something like foo.select(a.primary_residence == True) #I >> know this is wrong >> >>
-- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
