On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Ron Chatterjee <achatterjee...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You forgot to mention explicit vs. implicit Niphlod but pretty much you
> sum it up well. One thing I didn't understand is:
>
> "DAL is certainly improved in 6 years but still it won't ever be an ORM"
>
> In other words, ORM is better than DAL?  If that's the case, someone can
> also use sqlalchemy like they can use with django. Am I correct?
>
>
No, it doesn't mean ORM is better. It just means they are different.
Some people like DAL more, some like ORM.
And sure, you can use sqlalchemy if you prefer an ORM.

Marin


>
>
> On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 5:42:15 AM UTC-5, Maurice Waka wrote:
>>
>> Thanks@Niphlod
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Niphlod <nip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> honestly you can find it yourself, but for the sake of recaps:
>>> - small or none support for application's unittesting. up until now
>>> there have been a few experiments but no one landed in the code
>>> - routes_onerror can be used to cook something that will display the
>>> error right away, and I'm not so sure it'll work fine but there was an
>>> extension for google chrome or firefox that opened errors right away. That
>>> being said nobody is telling that the admin app can't be improved, it's an
>>> app and totally customizable
>>> - DAL is certainly improved in 6 years but still it won't ever be an
>>> ORM. That's the whole point of choosing a DAL over an ORM
>>> - we can't faster IDE adoption but there are a few that work fine with a
>>> little trick (web2pyslices holds the recipe)
>>> - web2py is completely multiprocess-aware. I'm not a big user of other
>>> frameworks but they smell less multiprocess-friendly than web2py (e.g. the
>>> cache and sessions). Because of those choices it's probably a little slower
>>> in single-process performances but nowadays production always requires
>>> multiple processes.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 9:26:02 AM UTC+1, Maurice Waka wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> I have been using web2py for about 1 yr now. I love it. I recently came
>>>> acros this crazy article about web2py advantages and disadvantages.
>>>> My question is that have, these disadvantages been addressed since 6
>>>> yrs ago in your updates?
>>>> Am working on and app and would love to launch it soon, in web2py and I
>>>> dont want programmers to come and discredit my work.
>>>> Here is the link:
>>>> http://ahmedsoliman.com/2010/07/29/the-good-and-bad-about-web2py/
>>>> Kind regards
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Resources:
>>> - http://web2py.com
>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/web2py/Ol4YRkIsuew/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> web2py+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "web2py-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to