It appear that i've sorted this out in the last crazy test, my problem where in filter fields, this was my code before:
accion = self.dbNueva.estatus_contratacion.validate_and_insert(**self.dbNueva.estatus_contratacion._filter_fields(x)).as_dict() Where x is a dict with all the fields i want to insert (including the id of the field), but when i insert this, the id is ignored an its assigned the next autoincrement id, i changed the code for this: accion = self.dbNueva.estatus_contratacion.validate_and_insert(id=x["id"], **self.dbNueva.estatus_contratacion._filter_fields(x)).as_dict() And it work perfectly. i dont know if this is a bug or this is the way it should work, but ._filter_fields appears to filter also the ID of the dict. Thanks for all your help anthony, i hope this can help other people. El lunes, 10 de octubre de 2016, 10:42:19 (UTC-4), Anthony escribió: > > OK, so what does your code look like? Why can't you preserve the id's? > > Anthony > > On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 9:43:50 AM UTC-4, > luis.va...@metamaxzone.com <javascript:> wrote: >> >> I thin that method doesnt work for me, let me explain better what i want >> to do: >> >> 6 months ago i released a production APP, now we will launch the second >> version of this app and there are several (big) differences between the >> database structure in production and the one i will deploy now, but i dont >> want to lose all the data collected in production, so what i want to do can >> be resumed in 3 steps: >> >> 1. Get all the information from the production database with the OLD >> structure >> 2. Format this information to the NEW structure (some fields will be >> deleted, other will be added... there are several changes) >> 3. Insert this data in the NEW structure database. >> >> Also, this app is created with a microservices architecture which means >> that i dont have only one database, instead i've 14 database that have >> cross data between them (i mean, the id stored for a user in the users >> database are also used in several other databases as reference to the user) >> >> So because this if i change the ids i will need to make a big coherence >> check around my 14 databases, with (approximately) 10 tables each one, this >> is a big deal as you can see. >> >> Thanks a lot for the help and i hope you can keep helping me. >> >> El jueves, 6 de octubre de 2016, 14:19:49 (UTC-4), Anthony escribió: >>> >>> Do you really need the id's to remain the same? Note, if you use this >>> method >>> <http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/06/the-database-abstraction-layer#CSV--all-tables-at-once-> >>> >>> to migrate, web2py will automatically update any reference fields so they >>> contain the new ids of referenced records. >>> >>> Anthony >>> >>> On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 5:47:36 PM UTC-4, >>> argenio...@metamaxzone.com wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm doing a migrate data of 2 databases with diferents tables. >>>> >>>> My only problems is with ids! >>>> >>>> table 1 >>>> id: 5, name: Diana >>>> id: 8, name: Carlos >>>> >>>> >>>> when i migrate this data to databases 2 >>>> id: 1, name: Diana >>>> id: 2, name: Carlos >>>> >>>> Look the id's not the same. >>>> >>>> what is the method to save the same id? >>>> I read about primarekey parameters but dont work. >>>> >>>> The process of migrate if a script with 2 Pydal, one for the old >>>> database and other for new databases. >>>> I execute one select() of everithing (not much data), later convert to >>>> the new structure and all work perfectly. the only problem is with ID . >>>> >>>> Please help me, thanks. >>>> >>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
