Version of soft are not so differents so config may still be used without changes, but this should be double check... For instance, for me, config had change significantly since 12.04 related to systemd... Nginx not much but uwsgi has change. It may wise to check for deprecated uwsgi parameter flag, depending if you use the web2py deployment script or not as the script is up to date for 16.04.
:) Richard On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jim S <j...@qlf.com> wrote: > mcm - thanks for that. > > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 12:23:27 PM UTC-5, mcm wrote: >> >> One clarification ... better performance is mostly due to the fact that >> the python GIL is not getting in the way.... >> >> 2016-10-25 19:20 GMT+02:00 Michele Comitini <michele....@gmail.com>: >> >>> > Regarding switching uwsgi to fork-only - should I expect a performance >>> hit? >>> >>> Unless you are very low on RAM you should expect better performance. >>> Linux fork is a clone call that uses fully fledged copy-on-write strategy. >>> Uwsgi forks are long running processes so forking overhead has little >>> impact. Forks happen late in the request handling chain so memory across >>> processes diverges little even on long periods. >>> >>> Keep an eye on RSS usage of processes (use top or htop) if you see a >>> memory runaway over time, uwsgi will take care of it killing the faulty >>> long running process. Memory runaway happening too frequently could be >>> an indication that there is something wrong with your code or some module >>> you use not releasing some large in memory structure. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2016-10-25 18:09 GMT+02:00 Jim S <j...@qlf.com>: >>> >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> Just checked my versions and my old systems that work have: >>>> >>>> uwsgi 2.0.10 >>>> nginx 1.4.6 >>>> web2py 2.14.6 >>>> >>>> New system that needs altered uwsgi config >>>> >>>> uwsgi 2.0.14 >>>> nginx 1.10.0 >>>> web2py 2.14.6 >>>> >>>> My uwsgi configs are identical except for the commented out 'limit-as = >>>> 512' line. Nginx configs are identical. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regarding switching uwsgi to fork-only - should I expect a performance >>>> hit? Any other gotchas I should consider? >>>> >>>> I'm not too concerned as my pages that use pandas have been working >>>> just fine for almost 6 months now. But, can never be too careful... >>>> >>>> Really appreciate all the input. >>>> >>>> -Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 9:50:36 AM UTC-5, Richard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Jim which web server are we talking now? Nginx? I think you should >>>>> copy/paste configuration so we can have look, I can compare to mine... >>>>> Just >>>>> the relevant part would suffice... >>>>> >>>>> About threading notice of pandas it says holding lock in case of >>>>> multiple dataframe copy, but Jim report he can't even import pandas as >>>>> pd... So I don't think it the root cause of his issue... But it good to >>>>> know I wasn't aware of that... >>>>> >>>>> Some good read about uwsgi relate to threading : >>>>> >>>>> http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ThingsToKnow.html (search >>>>> for thread) >>>>> >>>>> http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/articles/Serializ >>>>> ingAccept.html (I notice I have thunder-lock = true in my >>>>> emperor.ini) >>>>> >>>>> I would compare our nginx/uwsgi conf to see if there is not some diff >>>>> that could explained your issue... I am also curious to know if I could >>>>> have threading issue with pandas in my app... >>>>> >>>>> Richard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jim Steil <ato....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Massimo / Michele >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the input. I don't know anything about fork only mode. >>>>>> Looks like I have some reading to do. Thanks again for the input. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Michele Comitini < >>>>>> michele....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Jim as per Massimo input, did you check that your uwsgi >>>>>>> configuration is in fork mode only, no threading? That could be one >>>>>>> possible cause. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try also gunicorn instead of uwsgi http://gunicorn.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-10-25 7:19 GMT+02:00 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocket is a multithreaded server and pandas is not thread safe ( >>>>>>>> http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/gotchas.html) be very >>>>>>>> careful with it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 13:19:42 UTC-5, Dave S wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 8:50:51 AM UTC-7, Jim S wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I currently have my app deployed using Ubuntu 14.04 / nginx / >>>>>>>>>> uwsgi. I have a couple of servers load-balanced behind a haproxy >>>>>>>>>> server. >>>>>>>>>> I'm running ssl on the haproxy system and talking http to web2y >>>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>>> nginx/uwsgi. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now, I'm trying to upgrade ubuntu to 16.04 and an having issues >>>>>>>>>> with pandas (used in my web2py app) through the nginx/uwsgi stack. >>>>>>>>>> See >>>>>>>>>> this issue for what might be causing it - >>>>>>>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19439190/segmentation- >>>>>>>>>> fault-while-using-pandas-in-uwsgi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fixing this error is obviously something beyond my capabilities >>>>>>>>>> so it got me thinking about alternative deployment options. One >>>>>>>>>> that I'm >>>>>>>>>> considering is replacing my nginx / uwsgi stack with just the rocket >>>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>>> to serve the web2py app. My rocket servers (2 of them) would be >>>>>>>>>> behind the >>>>>>>>>> haproxy server so would not be public-facing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm aware of the recommendation against running rocket in a >>>>>>>>>> production environment but am not aware of the reasons for the >>>>>>>>>> recommendation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My question - does running multiple rocket servers behind haproxy >>>>>>>>>> remove the concerns about rocket in a production environment? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Jim >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not familiar with Pandas, so I can't comment on that part. I >>>>>>>>> run rocket, but only a single instance as a development environment. >>>>>>>>> Perhaps Mariano and Massimo have tested other configurations, but I >>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>> the bulk of us using rocket only run a single instance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are the specific rocket concerns? Scaling? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /dps >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Resources: >>>>>>>> - http://web2py.com >>>>>>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >>>>>>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >>>>>>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Michele Comitini >>>>>>> Glisco s.n.c. >>>>>>> tel: +39 335 66 71 336 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Resources: >>>>>>> - http://web2py.com >>>>>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >>>>>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >>>>>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>> the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to >>>>>>> pic/web2py/MTOjl8gPuTk/unsubscribe. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>> web2py+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Resources: >>>>>> - http://web2py.com >>>>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >>>>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >>>>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Resources: >>>> - http://web2py.com >>>> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >>>> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >>>> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "web2py-users" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >> -- > Resources: > - http://web2py.com > - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) > - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) > - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
