So the issue we run 6 workers on a machine and it works.  If we do 3 
workers on 2 machines we get deadlocks.  That is no exaggeration - 6 
records in our worker table and we're getting dealocks.

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 3:05:37 AM UTC-5, Niphlod wrote:
>
> you *should* have one different db for each environment. Each scheduler 
> tied to the same db will process incoming tasks, and it doesn't matter what 
> app effectively pushes them.
> This is good if you want to have a single scheduler (which can be composed 
> by several workers) serving many apps, but *generally* you don't want to 
> *merge* prod and beta apps.
>
> The is_ticker bit is fine: only one worker tied to a db is elegible to be 
> a ticker, which is the one process than manages asssigning tasks (to itself 
> AND to other available workers).
> Locking, once in a while, can happen and is self-healed. Continuous 
> locking is not good: either you have too many workers tied to the db OR 
> your db isn't processing concurrency at the rate that it needs. 
> SQLite can handle at most 2 or 3 workers. All the other "solid" backends 
> can manage up to 10, 15 at most.
> If you wanna go higher, you need to turn to the redis-backed scheduler.
>
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 10:59:31 PM UTC+1, Jason Solack wrote:
>>
>> Hello all, 
>>
>> I'm having some re-occurring issue with the scheduler.  We are currently 
>> running multiple environments (production, beta) and have several nodes in 
>> each environment.  If we have scheduler services running on all machines on 
>> each node we get a lot of deadlock errors.  If we drop each environment 
>> down to one node we get no deadlock errors.  I am noticing the field 
>> "is_ticker" in the worker table will only have one ticker across all the 
>> workers (spanning environments).  Is that the expected behavior?  I don't 
>> see any documentation about the ticker field so i'm not sure what to expect 
>> from that.
>>
>> Also is there any best practices about running the scheduler in an 
>> environment that i've described?  
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Jason
>>
>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to