Just for reference: https://www.jhipster.tech/
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:59 AM Kevin Keller <keller...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, if you want to have something different, we would probably need to > look into things like scaffolding of a web3py REST backend with oauth2+jwt > security for the endpoints plus automatic openapi (swagger) > documentation/files and a frontend based i,.e. on Vue.js or React/Angular. > Somewhat similiar to JHipster. > I suppose the decoupling of frontend javasript and backend python code is > where the development of web pages is headed. > That would also enable easy to create mobile applications with a web2py > backend. > > Other ideas are of course to develop the low code approach further, to > have something like Oracle APEX https://apex.oracle.com/en/ or > https://anvil.works/, which is a low code environment purely based on > python > including the frontend. > While it uses sculpt which is only python2 comptabile, we could look and > transcrypt if we had a visual environment were poeple can drag and drop > elements and code their behaviour in python via transcrypt. > https://www.transcrypt.org/ > > So I dont know where you thoughts were headed, but it is towards the > future, then these are my 2 cents. > Possibly low hanging fruit is to focus on easy REST API with automatic > openapi documentation and then go from there. > > But if we are there, I suppose we are already at Web4Py, which is even a > better sounding name. > > Web3Py, just to regain more popularity, but making it clear that web2py is > fully python3 compatible and increase stability by further code reviews by > more coders would be a good first step I thought. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:47 AM Massimo Di Pierro < > massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think web3py should be something a little different, not just web2py >> for python3. >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 17 March 2019 05:42:16 UTC-7, Kevin Keller wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> So I was wondering today what you guys would think about the idea to >>> rename web2py to Web3py, once it reaches a level of maturity that would be >>> able to justify the rename and a reboot. >>> >>> That would also mean to update the web page and various resources. >>> >>> The reason is simple : >>> >>> It seems that since around 2016 python 3 has seen a major increase in >>> adoption while web2py adoption decreased due to being perceived as python2 >>> only framework, which at the time was certainly true. >>> >>> While it's not true anymore, I think the perception of being a python2 >>> only framework combined with outdated resources doesn't help adoption. >>> >>> While sacrificing the established name is certainly not great, I think >>> the benefits of a reboot with a name change to emphasize the python3 >>> compatibility would far outweigh any drawback. >>> Python2 compatibility that is maintained would however seen as a plus >>> and a major differentiator to other frameworks that dropped python2 >>> support. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> -- >> Resources: >> - http://web2py.com >> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) >> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) >> - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "web2py-users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
