My thought exactly. On Thursday, 28 March 2019 18:46:47 UTC-7, Joe Barnhart wrote: > > I agree that back porting web2py code should be straightforward (after > all, it's not rocket science :-D). But maybe we should revisit those > modules and pare them down to minimalist proportions. I really need Auth, > complete with user roles and groups, but there's probably a better way to > minimize/abstract and provide a growth path. > > Plus, with py3 and web2py in hand, its not like there's a fire that needs > putting out. > > -- Joe > > > On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 2:16:15 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> I know this comes up once in a while but ... >> >> https://github.com/web2py/web3py >> >> what do you think? >> >> It is very preliminary but I will have an admin soon. >> Backporting SQLFORM, grid and Auth, should not be that complicated, >> although I think we can do better. >> >> Massimo >> >>
-- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
