On Aug 7, 2009, at 12:22 AM, mdipierro wrote: > > I will take a patch for this.
If nobody else gets to it first, I'll work up a patch over the weekend. > > Massimo > > On Aug 7, 1:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2009, at 9:32 PM, DenesL wrote: >> >>> IS_EMAIL does not follow the RFC specs for valid email addresses >>> (seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address) >> >>> even a simple a...@b.com fails >> >>> it is kinda late to work on the regex now, maybe tomorrow. >> >> The RFC is fairly hard to validate. If that's what we really want, I >> found this one on the web that looks about right: >> >> ^(?!\.)("([^"\r\\]|\\["\r\\])*"|([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?...@[a- >> z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$ >> >> It assumes the case-insensitive flag. >> >> http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate-an- >> email... >> >> Overkill? Or, what the heck? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
