yes, they should do. It really takes nothing since already list cherrypy and we have more users.
On Sep 9, 5:51 am, Richard <richar...@gmail.com> wrote: > yes, but it would be good if they officially supported/recognized > web2py like they do Django, Turbogears, etc. > > On Sep 9, 4:53 pm, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 3:59 pm, Richard <richar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There are 2 threads in the WebFaction forum at the moment about > > > getting better support for > > > web2py:http://forum.webfaction.com/viewtopic.php?id=3184http://forum.webfact... > > > > I know quite a few of us use WebFaction, so if you think it's a good > > > idea add your voice to the thread. > > > You do realise you don't have to wait for WebFaction to write a custom > > installer for web2py, you could using their custom installer script > > feature to write your own installer and host it on web2py site. If > > people want to use it, they just need to point the custom installer > > script option at the URL on web2py site and it will suck it down, let > > you review it if you want and then run it. > > > So, why wait for WebFaction. > > > Graham --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
