On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Iceberg <iceb...@21cn.com> wrote: > > I don't really care which question is the primary one but, it doesn't > harm to go back to the beginning point: Currently, the way code is > written, [id] in a URL will > be replaced by the created/modified id of the record, ONLY IF it is > relative path (No leading '/', no leading 'http:'). The side effect is > that, one obvious usage: > next=URL(...) > doesn't work, which is not desired IMHO. >
Yes, precisely - and I agree (that URL() calls should work with this 'feature') - this is what needs discussion, and Massimo's agreement (or alternate position at least). - Yarko --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
