I think what he really wants is the same thing I have been discussing for quite a while :)
For now, sqlform.custom is the way to go http://web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/205 -Thadeus On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:25 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > I think this should do it: > > form=SQLFORM(...) > form.components=[row[1][0] for row in form[0].components] > > You can try variations > > On Jan 5, 4:18 pm, Alexandre <airm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to get SQLFORM without tables, just one field on top of the >> other, is that possible? >> >> It would be nice if instead of a table, we could iterate through the fields >> in SQLFORM, so that we could represent it anyway we would like. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexandre Rosenfeld >> >> Eng Comp 06 - USP São Carlos >> FoG -http://fog.icmc.usp.br >> IM Team - AIESEC > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
