I am using Cherokee + uWSGI, couldn't be happier... only reason for not using nginx is I do love cherokee's web interface for configuration.
-Thadeus On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, mr.freeze <nat...@freezable.com> wrote: > I wonder how Passenger WSGI compares? I'm running web2pyslices.com > with it but might move to uWSGI if there is a significant reason. Any > opinions? > > On Mar 16, 9:36 pm, Alex Fanjul <alex.fan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> uWSGI is the clear winner by far... >> >> I think the winner mix is uWSGI + NGINX >> >> http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/2010-03-05-deployment-with-uwsgi-and-nginx >> >> El 17/03/2010 2:58, waTR escribi : >> >> >http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers >> >> -- >> Alejandro Fanjul Fdez. >> alex.fan...@gmail.comwww.mhproject.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
