I said, "I have no object to gradual rollover." but meant to say "I have
no objection to gradual rollover."
I mean that I'm misspelling words like you typically do. It was meant
in jest. ;-P
My mom was a stickler for proper pronunciation (being in Oklahoma you
can see how that might be important).
But I digress, rocket now has online documentation (though it is of
little applicability to web2py). http://packages.python.org/rocket/
On 3/22/2010 10:37 AM, mdipierro wrote:
Not sure what than means. Hope it is good.
On Mar 22, 10:31 am, Timothy Farrell<tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote:
*objection
Gosh Massimo, you're wearing off on me.
On 3/22/2010 9:49 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
I have no object to gradual rollover. One way that could satisfy from
all angles is to have HTTPS configurations default to use Rocket while
regular connections use Cherrypy. This would accomplish:
- revealing it to a smaller portion of the web2py user-ship at first
- remove the requirement of compiling both pyOpenSSL and the ssl module
On 3/22/2010 9:44 AM, mdipierro wrote:
I have no objection to having an option and I would take a patch in
this direction but: 1) I prefer to have rocket as default (else we
will never know if there is some obscure problem with it) and, 2) they
should both use ssl and not openssl so I do not have to redo the re-
packaging.
Right now we have one problem that needs to be fixed first. web2py.exe
-h does not work for 1.76.5.3.b
On Mar 22, 9:28 am, Jonathan Lundell<jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
web2py could support both but the benefits get lost quickly.
web2py is designed to be simple, asking the user to pick which
bundled web server they would like to use is too much in my opinion.
No need to ask; there'd be a silent default.
I'm thinking mainly of an overlapped transition.
Short or Tall?
Caf or Decaf?
Sugar?
Milk? (steamed?)
Cinnamon?
For here or To-go?
How would you like your web2py today?
On 3/20/2010 12:39 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Mar 20, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Timothy Farrell wrote:
Vasile Ermicioi, put in a vote for Rocket to be included in
web2py because I'm in the web2py community and there is still
plenty of room for Rocket to be optimized (which I noted).
I like the idea of built-in servers as plugins (not formally, but
the general idea of supporting more than one in a simply
configured way). The downside is that we won't have as focused
testing of any one server, but it's compensated for by how much
easier it would be to include a new server in the release without
running the risk of breaking existing installations.
As I've said, I don't think that ultimate performance need be a
high priority for the built-in server; rather, ease of use and
rock-solid stability are the priorities. And I think I like
relying on the SSL package.
My inclination: enable easy server switching. Keep CherryPy the
default for at least one more release, but make Rocket and sneaky
easy to ask for from at startup. That'll give those of us who are
interested easy access to Rocket in a low-risk way. And then at
some point, possibly very soon, switch the default to Rocket,
retaining an easy option for the others as a fallback.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
