Correction:

since what is returned by _TEST is html and not well-formed xml
-->
since what is returned to _TEST is html and not well-formed xml

On Jul 2, 2:02 pm, Kerem Eryılmaz <keryil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Solved. It turns out the tests failed iff I included a specific xmlrpc
> function which streams xml. It contained the line:
>
> response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xml'
>
> which made the test page fail expecting to see html; since what is
> returned by _TEST is html and not well-formed xml which chokes the
> parser. I simply encapsulated the function body save the above line as
> a new function:
>
> def myfunction():
>  response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xml'
>  blah blah
>
> -->
>
> def __myfunction__():
>  blah blah
> def myfunction():
>  response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xml'
>  return __myfunction__()
>
> and modified my tests to use the version which does not modify
> headers. Just in case anybody else runs into the same problem.
>
> Also, thanks for the effort Massimo.
>
> On Jul 1, 7:12 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > Can you email me your app?
>
> > Massimo
>
> > On 1 Lug, 10:16, Kerem Eryılmaz <keryil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Through the administrative interface of web2py. I click on the test
> > > for all controllers i.e.http://localhost:8000/admin/default/test/app_name
>
> > > On Jul 1, 3:06 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > How are you calling the tests?
>
> > > > On 1 Lug, 03:49, Kerem Eryılmaz <keryil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hmm... This might be the problem then, the doctest results that do not
> > > > > get loaded are returned as "Content-Type application/xml" whereas the
> > > > > other tests are "Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8". Since the
> > > > > returned html isn't a well formed xml, I am getting this error. Do you
> > > > > have an idea why the content type might be set incorrectly?
>
> > > > > On Jun 30, 11:37 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The test controller generates "<h2>....</h2> and that is a piece of
> > > > > > html received via ajax, not xml. It should be valid.
>
> > > > > > On 30 Giu, 15:25, Kerem Eryýlmaz <keryil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I ran the admin application's test page for my controller 
> > > > > > > (i.e.http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/default/test/std/etc.py) through 
> > > > > > > firebug,
> > > > > > > and it looks like it is an issue with the xml produced by web2py. 
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > parser fails and the page is never updated (i.e. keeps flashing
> > > > > > > "please wait") but the response is received.
>
> > > > > > > Error reads:
>
> > > > > > > XML Parsing Error: junk after document element Location: moz-
> > > > > > > nullprincipal:{2bf026d5-ea46-4b0a-9bdd-21128033bf26} Line Number 
> > > > > > > 1,
> > > > > > > Column 47:
>
> > > > > > > <h2>Testing controller "etc.py" ... done.</h2><br/>
> > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------^
>
> > > > > > > Here is the problem, ./gluon/compileapp.py, lines 55-56:
>
> > > > > > > html = '<h2>Testing controller "%s.py" ... done.</h2><br/>\n' \
> > > > > > >     % request.controller
>
> > > > > > > I think starting with <h2> as the root element is the cause.
>
> > > > > > > So really, no one else?
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 30, 9:26 pm, Kerem Eryýlmaz <keryil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > I wonder if anyone encountered similar problems with doctests. 
> > > > > > > > I have
> > > > > > > > a couple of controllers (default.py and etc.py), and a single 
> > > > > > > > function
> > > > > > > > (__addTLI__) in etc.py that has a doctest. When I try to run 
> > > > > > > > the tests
> > > > > > > > through the admin app, default.py passes fine (since it has no 
> > > > > > > > tests),
> > > > > > > > but etc.py just hangs. I have confirmed that there is a line in 
> > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > code that determines whether etc.py will hang or return 
> > > > > > > > successfully,
> > > > > > > > however I do not see how it is possible that the specific piece 
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > code determines anything (basically it produces an xml file 
> > > > > > > > through
> > > > > > > > some db interaction). I tried the same testing code in a 
> > > > > > > > function,
> > > > > > > > opened it up on a browser and it ran fine, error-free. I also 
> > > > > > > > checkedhttp://127.0.0.1:8000/std/etc/_TESTforrawtestdata, but 
> > > > > > > > it also
> > > > > > > > surprisingly revealed that __addTLI__ had actually passed.
>
> > > > > > > > Is it possible for a test to hang even though all subtests pass?
>
> > > > > > > > BTW, I use version 1.79.2
>
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Kerem.
>
>

Reply via email to