I tested this, and it does give all contacts when using > contacts = db(db.contact.id>0).select()
Unfortunately, using > person = db(db.person.id>0).select() also returns all the contacts. I think the intended behavior is to just return the contacts that are also a person (as well as those that are a sub-class of person.) Additionally, trying to get at the person- specific fields fails in that case, e.g.: > for contact in person > response.flash= contact.first_name doesn't work. Also, the syntax is great for supporting polymodel, but if you want to later add support for expando classes, it might be a bit awkward. ~Dave On Sep 4, 10:34 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > Can you help testing polymodel? In trunk: > > db=DAL('gae') > db.define_table('contact',Field('address'), polymodel=True) > db.define_table('person',Field('first_name'), polymodel=db.contact) > db.define_table('company',Field('business_name'), > polymodel=db.contact) > > db.person.insert(first_name="John", address="here') > db.company.insert(business_name="John Inc", address="there') > contacts = db(db.contact.id>0).select() # should lists both persons > and conpanies > > Massimo > > On Sep 2, 11:07 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > I agree that polymodel would be trivial. We would only need to decide > > how to pass parameters to db.define_table to determine if a table is a > > polymodel or extends an existing one. This would not have an > > equivalent in SQL. > > > On Sep 2, 10:40 am, Dave <thefe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm new to Web2py and trying to get a sense for its GAE support, > > > beyond the basic "RDBMS-like" functions (which Web2py seems to support > > > very well!) > > > > Expando models and PolyModel: Is there any way to use either of these > > > with the DAL currently? Are there plans to, if not? PolyModel > > > especially seems like it wouldn't be too difficult to add, as it can > > > be used identically to the default Model class (all of its magic is > > > handled under the hood I think.) > > > > Thanks for the information, and the great work so far. I'm really > > > impressed with how easy web2py is to develop with.