> I read the example with great interest, but I don't understand why "3 > Web2Py instances, one XML configuration" is better than multiple > configuration files. I'm not saying it's not better, I just really > don't understand it. > > It would seem that either way, one still has 3 uwsgi instances and 3 > web2py instances. > > Could you please explain why this is useful?
Imagine a sysadmin of a web2py-only company that has to deploy hundreds of apps. Every time its the same task. Having one config file that inherit common options could be a huge commodity (he add only 2 lines instead of defining a new file). It is matter of taste, for example i prefer to have a file for every app :) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it
