Love the new welcome app design.
Instead of developing flash further how about just using jgrowl
instead.
> It requires downloading 3 more files and the advantages are minimal.
I think the advantages are worthwhile and the extra files do not
matter if they are stored in sub-folders to avoid clutter.
On Nov 4, 5:27 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> One thing we can do is a FLASH helper that allows:
>
> response.flash=flash('test',mode='warn')
>
> This is already in the new welcome app but we could promote flash to a
> FLASH helper. Pros? Cons?
> It would link a helper to some image static files that may not be
> there.
>
> We could add some JS code insider that can reposition it but I do not
> think that is a good idea. The position should be fixed and determined
> by the CSS.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Nov 3, 12:09 pm, rochacbruno <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Would be a good idea to have more options for flash.
>
> > I.e: response.flash('hello world',position='top-right')
>
> > Enviado via iPhone
>
> > Em 03/11/2010, às 14:56, Martín Mulone <mulone.mar...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > > Massimo I think welcome is broken in trunk, there no files in views/ :O
>
> > > Often the user does not notice that something has just appeared in the
> > > flash box
>
> > > Perhaps a variation of flash 'silen', that goes like an application
> > > statusbar, on bottom and thin.
>
> > > 2010/11/3 mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > > I think this is fixed and layouts now work with both old welcome and
> > > new welcome.
>
> > > Can somebody try it please?
>
> > > Just install one random layout (old welcome and new welcome) and use
> > > firebug to make sure superfish.js is found.
>
> > > Massimo
>
> > > On Nov 3, 4:37 am, Branko Vukelic <bg.bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:00 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > We have two solutions:
> > > > > 1) change all layouts w2p files to look for superfish in static/ or in
> > > > > static/js
> > > > > 2) move all the current static files in static/ and our of static/css,
> > > > > static/js, static/images/.
>
> > > > > Probably 1) is a better option.
>
> > > > If you can customize it anyway you want in a custom template, I really
> > > > see no problem with 1).
>
> > > > --
> > > > Branko Vukelić
>
> > > > bg.bra...@gmail.com
> > > > stu...@brankovukelic.com
>
> > > > Check out my blog:http://www.brankovukelic.com/
> > > > Check out my portfolio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/
> > > > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/)
> > > > I hang out on identi.ca:http://identi.ca/foxbunny
>
> > > > Gimp Brushmakers Guildhttp://bit.ly/gbg-group
>
> > > --
> > > My blog:http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
> > > My portfolio *spanish*:http://www.tecnodoc.com.ar
> > > Checkout my last proyect instant-press:http://www.instant2press.com
>
>
