Right. I get it now. Is there a reason for not sticking the record creation inside of its own table?
-- Thadeus 2010/11/12 Mirek Zvolský <zvol...@seznam.cz> > hich person is an employee of which company, > 2) which person has created the company record, > 3) which person has created the person records, > all 3 relations are "1:m" relations. > > To realize "1:m" relation there is no need to add a connecting table > and if you do so, that would be a realy very bad design ! > And it's easy to say why in other words: > Because in case of real "m:m" relation there can be more as one > records in the added connecting table to describe relationship between > two entities. > But if you will add connecting table from your weak reasons, then you > will have always one(!) record in the connecting tab >
