The discussion was started by the advocates of non-copyleft licences. I'm perfectly fine with web2py on GPL terms (even without exceptions), besides maybe I would like to see it upgraded to GPLv3. However, it is too often we see the attempts to frame the GPL as deterrent scary licence that limits the project adoption and nobody takes a strong stance against such unfair claims. Then this false image of what GPL is and how it works is spread, because people are lazy and they will rather accept anonymous comment on the Internet as true rather than check the GPL faq or the licence itself. This is why I replied. Who knows, maybe sombody will learn from it something new.
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Anthony
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... LightDot
- [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Wikus van de Merwe
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... pbreit
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Wikus van de Merwe
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Wikus van de Merwe
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... pbreit
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... pbreit
- [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... VP
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Thadeus Burgess
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Branko Vukelic
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Anthony
- Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... Anthony