....they **should** have.... On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Albert Abril <albert.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It remains me that django conference where they make joke about the girl > who wants the pony: > http://www.linuxformat.com/files/nopony.jpg > > disclaimer: i love django too, but they have respect all the ways of doing > things. > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, January 7, 2011 2:58:14 AM UTC-5, cjrh wrote: >> >>> On Jan 7, 12:06 am, Anthony <abas...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > In case anyone is interested... >>> > >>> > http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/ex54j/seeking_clarification_o... >>> >>> >>> Massimo should just stop caring. The reddit people have already >>> heard the sales pitch, and further energy spent on trying to convince >>> them is wasted. >> >> >> You're right, it's not worth spending energy to try to convince these >> particular individuals -- they've all got vested interests (personal or >> professional) in alternatives. However, lots of disinterested folks are also >> reading those reddit threads, so sometimes it's worth correcting the record >> just so web2py is not publicly defined solely by its detractors. I was >> reading these kinds of discussions a few months back when I was researching >> web frameworks, and if it hadn't been for Massimo correcting some false >> claims of others, I might have been scared off of web2py. >> >> Anthony >> > >
