so what u suggested? use cache.ram or not or maybe try memcache?
please advice...
thanks and best regards,
steve van christie
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:50 AM, VP <vtp2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think cache.ram is funky. I tried a small test by cache.ram'ing a
> controller function, like this:
>
> @cache(request.env.path_info, time_expire=10, cache_model=cache.ram\
> )
> def test():
> d = dict(x = 30)
> return response.render(d)
>
> and in test.html
>
> {{=x}}
>
> ..
>
> If you change 30 to 40, for example, the behavior is that the value
> during the 10 seconds could be 30 or 40 after each refresh. The
> behavior is not deterministic, so it's difficult to debug.
>
> cache.disk doesn't seem to have this behavior.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 13, 7:49 pm, Stifan Kristi <steve.van.chris...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > yes, after i inserted a new data, i immediately checked the new one, but
> it
> > didn't appears, after i checked it many times, and after few minutes, the
> > data is show up. i think for now, i'll try to not use *cache =
> (cache.ram,
> > 60)*, because i'm still learning the python and web2py.
> >
> > thank you so much for your adviced.
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > steve van christie
