Oui! tres cool! Just did fist pass and no issues as far as keeping the existing stuff working as well! :) Now will go for pass 2 by changing some import statements and adding few for testing.
Thanks, Mart :) On Apr 25, 11:06 pm, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool! I will test it now! Thank you for the improvement. > > Web2py is getting better every 2 weeks \o/ > -- > Bruno Rocha > [ About me:http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno] > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:53 PM, pierreth <pierre.thibau...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 25 avr, 20:44, mart <msenecal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > how cool! so if all looks good, will we need to make a switch or will > > > both be supported for a while? > > > > Thanks, > > > Mart :) > > > The new import function changes how things are loaded when a module is > > imported from models, controllers or modules (the "modules" > > directory). If you do "import x" it will try transparently to do > > "import applications.your_app.modules.x". If it does not work, it will > > fall back on the traditional Python way of importing things. > > > This new import enables to have different modules or packages that are > > dependent on one or another in the "modules" folder. Before that, the > > developer was force to modify the modules to use local_import instead > > or import or from this import that. > > > A second good thing is that if app A uses x in 'modules' and app B > > uses a different version of x in 'modules', the two versions will work > > without collision. > > > The down side is that import x for app A does import x under the > > module name "applications.A.modules.x" and for the app B it is of > > course "applications.B.modules.x" so if the developer is expecting to > > have a module named "x" in sys.modules, he will have a bad surprise. > > But it is very small inconvenient I believe. It is small design tread > > off. > > > local_import still work like before and it enables modules to be > > easily reloaded. But we can now use a standard import. > > > This is now available in trunk. > > > Cool?
