Yes. But I think the book might not be the appropriate place for this. I am not sure but I think it might be better to start a wiki.
On Apr 26, 7:39 am, Gilson Filho <cont...@gilsondev.com> wrote: > The web2py has been a tool that is improving and evolving over time, and who > uses itknows it. Only for people to learn these new features or fixes to > existing becomes moredifficult when there is no consistent documentation. As > far as I know, Massimo web2pywhich updates the book, but with so many issues > in the project, it is complicated tocontinue with this activity. We > community web2py Brazil-users were discussing this, thatmany of the > facilities of the framework are not documented, and I propose taking > advantage of all this: to help update the documentation web2py undertaken to > reviewexisting content and description of use of new features. > > What do you think? > _____________________________________________ > *Gilson Filho* > *Web Developerhttp://gilsondev.com*
