Yes, wrong. Now updating. 2011/4/29 Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>
> On Apr 29, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Martín Mulone wrote: > > http://bit.ly/kYC5Pw > > > Did you test that? I think it should be the other way around--that is, that > applications=None disabled application-name removal from the URL. > > > 2011/4/27 Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> > >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:40 PM, pbreit wrote: >> > But I think he wants his app to be the default and still have it show in >> the URL? >> >> With the parametric (new) router, you can do that by specifying: >> applications=None in the base router. >> > > > -- http://martin.tecnodoc.com.ar
