> Good to hear. > It's possible using auth.user_id might also fix it like that. > This is what it says in the book: > auth.user contains a copy of the db.auth_user records for the current logged > in user or None otherwise. There is also also a auth.user_id which is the > same as auth.user.id (i.e. the id of the current logger in user) or None. >
I've replaced my early change with auth.user_id and that works too. Thank you :-) Chris
