what is the difference between orientDB and other graph databases? like endeca
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:12 PM, TheSweetlink <yanosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have tested bulbs with Rexster and while they are great products > with an equally great community, there are some existing > incompatibilities that prevent usage of OrientDB's remote engine. > This is the only one that allows multiple connections to a db as well > as the built-in clustering capabilities. It is being worked on to my > understanding and will work in the future. > > With regards to bulbs, it is really cool stuff but so abstract that > you cannot take advantage of many of OrientDB specific features. > Namely, schema, indicies work differently, possibly others I cannot > think of. I love the whole Tinkerpop stack and Rexster/bulbs, will > definitely use them, but not sure if it's a clean fit for an OrientDB > --> web2py specific adapter. The concept of being able to use bulbs > for all of those datastores would bring even more flexibility so it's > rather appealing in that sense. > > -David > > On Sep 3, 7:16 pm, Vasile Ermicioi <elff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> what do you think if we will write and adapter on top of rexter (or >> bulbflow)? we will have an adapter for all rexster graph databases >> (TinkerGraph, Neo4j, OrientDB, DEX, and Sail RDF Stores) >> >> http://code.google.com/p/orient/wiki/ProgrammingLanguageBindings#Lang...https://github.com/tinkerpop/rexster/wikihttp://bulbflow.com/
