Do you need the field's widget or it's represent (they're two different
things)? Note, the represent attribute is a function/callable (usually a
lambda) that takes a value (and optionally a record), so if you want to use
it directly, you have to call it and pass a value to it.
{{=A.B.represent(your_value, optional_record)}}
Would be similar for the widget.
Anthony
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:19:08 AM UTC-4, Matt wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Is there a way to specify a value for the representation of a Field
> object? I have a class (lets call it A) with a Field object member
> variable (lets call it B), in my view I call {{=A.B.represent}} in
> order to display the default widget for this field. I would like to
> "fill" that widget with a value as well, is that possible?
>
> Matt
>
