I reopened it and process it asap. Thanks for bringing this up....

@everybody. If your patch, suggestion, etc has been ignored. Please
assume I have forgotten about it and remind me. Even if there is an
open issue.

On Dec 14, 12:01 pm, Matt Broadstone <mbroa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure if you will get updates on that ticket (because its been
> closed as fixed), but I added an extra missing piece of code for that
> patch. The url again is:http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=532.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Massimo Di Pierro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Your patch is good (for pam and other methods that allow the app to
> > handle the password) and it is in trunk
>
> > On Nov 21, 3:35 pm, Matt Broadstone <mbroa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Massimo Di 
> >> Pierro<massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Good point. Basic auth may not work with PAM. Please open a ticket.
>
> >> OK, issue created:http://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/detail?id=532
>
> >> Also, in the comments section I've included a patch to allow PAM
> >> authentication. As I note in the comment I don't have time to check
> >> that this works for all auth cases, but we only allow PAM and form
> >> based logins so this solution suffices for our needs.
>
> >> Matt
>
> >> > On Nov 21, 1:26 pm, Matt Broadstone <mbroa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Is it possible to use PAM for basic auth? I have basic auth working
> >> >> (thanks to Hong-Khoan Quach's patch), however I can't seem to link it
> >> >> to PAM. We are using PAM successfully for web based user
> >> >> authentication, but basic auth seems to be ignoring this.
>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Matt

Reply via email to